Back to blog
Mindset7 min read

Building in Public: Genuinely Useful, or Just Performative?

By ·

Build in public has become an identity. For a small number of founders, it's their best marketing channel. For most, it's a distraction that creates the feeling of marketing without any of the results. The difference comes down to one thing: whether your audience and your customer are the same people.

When build in public works

  • You're building for indie hackers, founders, or developers — i.e., the BIP audience IS your customer.
  • You enjoy writing and would post anyway.
  • You can commit to 3–5 posts/week for 12+ months without burning out.
  • You're comfortable being honest about failures (sanitized BIP is invisible).

When it quietly fails

  • Your customer is a veterinarian, paralegal, or HVAC dispatcher — they aren't on X.
  • You hate writing and force a daily post.
  • You measure success in likes instead of paying users.
  • You confuse engagement from other founders with product-market fit.

The real cost

BIP eats 1–2 hours/day of mental energy. For some founders that energy would have gone to Reels nobody watched. For others it's the energy that should have been DMing 30 prospects/day. Be honest about the alternative.

The vibe-coder trap

BIP can become socially acceptable procrastination — see The Vibe-Coding Trap. Posting about building feels like building. Posting about MRR feels like growing. Neither is.

The honest test

After 90 days of BIP, look at where your paying users actually came from. If less than 30% came from BIP-driven traffic, the channel is wrong for your business. Stop and pour the time into the channel that works.

Free tool

Score your idea in under 4 minutes.

Take the quiz →